NMD-VCell Neuromuscular Virtual Cell Research Platform Module: Registry · Evidence → perturbation → experiment → outcome NMD = neuromuscular disorders

Evidence Release 2026.08DMD context observedDMD candidate-conditioned prediction locked

View scientific status
Evidence freeze: 3 August 2026 P59 hold · scorer failure retained · no target score NAR working package · 6 main + 31 supplementary figures Resource: v1.2.0-measured-dmd-evidence Schema: 1.1 Open platform state → Open Trust Center → Open evidence dashboard → Open claim registry → Open release status →

Measured DMD evidence · Stage C2

DMD induction, patient replication and CRISPR correction are now connected by an auditable pathway analysis.

This release adds biological-repeat-aware Reactome tests for GSE272233 and sample-level external disease validation. It strengthens disease-context evidence and provides reference axes for a prespecified prospective candidate-validation study.

Measured disease context, prediction still lockedDMD-locus perturbation and patient-muscle pathway evidence are observed. Candidate-gene response prediction, therapeutic efficacy and patient-level simulation remain unavailable.

Evidence chain

Four layers are shown together, but their inferential roles remain separate.

Inspect statistical units →
DMD induction

Engineered and patient DMD agree descriptively

GSE233606 provides an unselected gene-axis bridge between engineered DMD and a patient line. It is descriptive, not donor-level inference.

Patient replication

291 camera-supported pathways

PRJNA772047 uses five reported donor/sample pseudobulks. PRJNA1218493 and mouse GSE156497 remain directional sensitivity layers.

CRISPR correction

24 background-specific reversals

GSE272233 uses three reported biological repeats per group. No dual-supported pathway reverses across all three mutation backgrounds.

Organoid heterogeneity

Context dependence retained

Organoid evidence is shown as a heterogeneity layer and is not pooled into a universal DMD response.

NAR main figure

Disease induction → patient replication → correction → heterogeneity

Four-panel measured DMD evidence figure showing induction, external patient pathway agreement, CRISPR correction and organoid heterogeneity.
Figure 8 keeps descriptive, formal and sensitivity-only evidence visually distinct. The lower strip summarizes the four measured evidence layers and their inferential units.
Figure 8 long description, data table and methods

Long description. Panel A shows a positive descriptive association between the unselected engineered-DMD and patient-DMD gene axes (Spearman 0.4498 across 23,324 genes; direction agreement 68.29%). Panel B separates one formal patient pseudobulk test from two directional sensitivity datasets: 291 PRJNA772047 pathways have camera support, while 54.73% of 1,480 shared pathways keep the same direction across all three external datasets. Panel C compares three DMD-locus correction backgrounds; 24 dual-supported pathway reversals occur only in dup8–9 and none are shared by all backgrounds. Panel D shows decreasing organoid-to-disease pathway agreement across DMD1, DMD2 and DMD3 (0.6803, 0.6413 and 0.5533), preserving heterogeneity rather than pooling it away.

Accessible key-value table for Figure 8. The downloadable TSV contains all 20 plotted rows.
PanelEvidence layerMetricValuenInference
ADMD inductionUnselected gene-axis Spearman0.449823,324 genesDescriptive; one line per condition
ADMD inductionDirection agreement68.29%23,324 genesDescriptive; no cell-level P values
BPatient replicationcamera-supported pathways2911,526 pathways3 DMD vs 2 normal donors/samples
BExternal sensitivitySame direction in all three datasets54.73%1,480 pathwaysDirectional agreement only
CCRISPR correctionBackground-specific dual reversals241,559 pathwaysObserved only in dup8–9
CCross-background correctionDual reversal in all backgrounds0 · measured null3 backgroundsMeasured absence under the frozen rule
DOrganoid heterogeneityDirection agreement range0.5533–0.68031,511 pathwaysDescriptive; shared WT reference

Methods boundary. Panel A is descriptive. Panel B uses camera only for PRJNA772047 and direction-only sensitivity for the other datasets. Panel C keeps mutation backgrounds separate and uses the frozen dual-support rule. Panel D is a heterogeneity display, not a pooled universal response. Open figure-generation code.

Primary statistical readout

Strict consensus is sparse, and that result is preserved.

Dual reversal in all three correction backgrounds0 · measured null
Strict independent reversal in all three backgrounds0 · measured null
Background-specific dual-supported reversals24
Patient pathways with camera support291

The 492 fixed-effect cross-background reversals are explicitly exploratory because WT is non-isogenic and heterogeneity is substantial. They are not promoted to validated virtual-cell predictions.

Reusable objects

API, pathway tables, sample QC and code share one release identity.

GSE272233 API External validation API Sample QC API camera results RO-Crate only · open manifest External effects RO-Crate only · open manifest

Independent rebuild receipt

All 16 clean-room comparisons pass.

The path-isolated rebuild regenerated GSE233606 induction, GSE272233 correction and camera tests, three external pseudobulk pathway layers, GSE277637 heterogeneity and Figure 8. Numeric tables and metadata-independent figure pixels match the released analysis.

Boundary: this is path/process-isolated computational reproduction using the same system Python/R packages, not a container-level independent-host reproduction and not biological validation.

Claim boundary

Supported: Measured DMD-locus induction/correction and sample-level external disease pathway replication with explicit small-n limitations.

Not supported: Candidate-gene response prediction in DMD cells, therapeutic efficacy, patient-level simulation and clinical decision support.