NMD-VCell Neuromuscular Virtual Cell Research Platform Module: Registry · Evidence → perturbation → experiment → outcome NMD = neuromuscular disorders

Release 2026.08DMD context observedDMD candidate-conditioned prediction not yet eligible

View scientific status
Evidence freeze: 3 August 2026 Resource: v1.2.0-measured-dmd-evidence Schema: 1.1 Open release status →

Reliability & Advantage Center · assessed 2026-08-16

Reliable where evidence is measured. Abstains where truth is missing.

NMD-VCell does not publish one trust score. It separates engineering integrity, evidence synthesis, task-level prediction and clinical validity because success in one layer cannot upgrade another.

Dependable nowIdentity · provenance · release integrity · bounded evidence navigation
Limited nowSame-context aggregate benchmark and hypothesis-level disease synthesis
Not established / prohibitedDMD response prediction · therapeutic ranking · patient or clinical use

Five defensible advantages

An advantage needs proof, a weakness and a falsification test.

These claims describe implemented product behavior. They do not claim a superior DMD predictor.

Download advantage evidence →
ADV-01PROVEN PRODUCT CAPABILITY

Evidence boundaries are product behavior

Measured, contextual, modeled, missing, failed and prohibited states remain distinct on public objects.

Proof
typed evidence states · claim ceilings · explicit abstentions · empty registries remain visible
Weakness
The advantage disappears if future releases collapse missingness into scores or hide failed runs.
Falsification test
Audit every new result route for source, task, execution state, prohibited uses and missing target-context outcome.
Next investment
Make the reliability registry a required release gate.
ADV-02PROVEN RESOURCE CAPABILITY

Neuromuscular context is first-class

Disease, cell state, perturbation, time and phenotype are represented as the scientific unit rather than collapsed into a gene score.

Proof
four disease routes · DMD process graph · cell-context registry · 21 governed DMD decision contracts
Weakness
Current DMD assets are rich context but do not contain matched candidate-conditioned DMD response truth.
Falsification test
Verify that every disease claim names the exact source context and inferential unit.
Next investment
Acquire a matched DMD myogenic perturbation pilot with independent biological units.
ADV-03STRUCTURALLY IMPLEMENTED NO RETURNED OUTCOMES

Research objects form a closed loop

Dataset, ModelRun, Study, Prediction and Outcome share identities and legal handoffs.

Proof
Dataset Cards · immutable ModelRun releases · Study Card planner · prospective lifecycle registry
Weakness
The outcome registry is intentionally empty, so the loop is structurally complete but not yet empirically exercised.
Falsification test
A future outcome must trace back to its frozen study, prediction, data and decision rule without manual reconstruction.
Next investment
Register and return the first prospective null, positive, toxic or failed outcome.
ADV-04PROVEN METHOD GOVERNANCE

Simple baselines are permanent

Advanced models cannot advance by reputation, scale or one aggregate metric.

Proof
same-coverage baseline rule · frozen G0-G7 tasks · six-level evaluation ladder · GEARS and scGPT failures retained
Weakness
A baseline firewall protects decisions but does not create missing disease outcome.
Falsification test
Re-run each advanced model against identical data, split, genes, seeds and metric code.
Next investment
Add perturbation-specific and population baselines as new output types become executable.
ADV-05PROVEN PRODUCT CAPABILITY

Negative results remain reusable assets

Failed, no-go, stopped, null and abstained states are released with the same identity discipline as positive results.

Proof
six ModelRun release pages · reproduction receipts · null cross-disease results · prohibited-use fields
Weakness
Negative computational results do not replace prospective biological validation.
Falsification test
Compare public registries against the complete execution ledger and require every terminal run to be represented.
Next investment
Attach resource-cost and failure-taxonomy fields to future ModelRuns.

Reliability matrix

Six domains; six different claim ceilings.

No composite reliability score is emitted because engineering integrity, evidence synthesis, perturbation prediction and clinical validity are non-interchangeable claims.

Download reliability matrix →
REL-01HIGH ENGINEERING CONFIDENCE

Software & release integrity

Build, route, schema and cross-surface gates pass locally.

Current evidencefull vinext production build PASS · 51 rendered contract tests · 246 multidisease checks · 24 cross-surface checks · checksum-addressed release objects
Permitted use
Rebuild, audit and navigate the released research resource.
Limitation
Anonymous command-line production QA is blocked by the existing edge HTTP 403 policy.
Do not infer
Engineering integrity does not validate a biological prediction.
State-changing gateAdd authenticated post-deploy route checks to the immutable production receipt.
REL-02HIGH RESOURCE CONFIDENCE

Identity, provenance & data contracts

Identifiers, sources, contexts, nulls and transformations are explicit.

Current evidence17,921 released gene records · HGNC alias map · Dataset Cards · typed API · checksums and release identities
Permitted use
Identity resolution, evidence lookup and reproducible data intake.
Limitation
A valid data object can still be unsuitable for a particular prediction task.
Do not infer
Presence in the resource is not disease relevance or efficacy.
State-changing gateRequire ontology and inferential-unit validation on every newly imported dataset.
REL-03BOUNDED RESEARCH CONFIDENCE

Disease evidence synthesis

Source-linked context is strong enough for hypothesis and study design.

Current evidenceDMD measured-evidence release · four disease modules · cell-context map · process and evidence graphs
Permitted use
Mechanism navigation, gap analysis and prospective study design.
Limitation
Observational and correction context does not establish candidate-conditioned causal response.
Do not infer
Do not treat integrated context as target efficacy or causal proof.
State-changing gateIndependent replication plus matched perturbation and functional endpoints.
REL-04LIMITED TASK CONFIDENCE

Same-context perturbation benchmark

Ridge slightly improves mean RMSE, but response direction is unsupported.

Current evidenceMRUN-RIDGE-SAFE-2.3-G0-REPEATED-FOLD · RMSE 0.1175 vs train mean 0.1180 · strict outcome gate 0/16
Permitted use
Permanent same-assay comparator and leakage diagnostic.
Limitation
The output is a 2,000-feature aggregate HepG2 mean vector, not a cell population or DMD response.
Do not infer
No directional transfer, DMD prediction or functional effect.
State-changing gateBeat matched means on perturbation-specific delta and distribution metrics across prospective holdouts.
REL-05NOT ESTABLISHED

Cross-context & DMD response prediction

No model has passed a matched DMD candidate-response task.

Current evidenceGEARS failed five frozen splits · scGPT lost to same-coverage baselines · TxPert calibration pending · direct DMD candidate outcome 0/21
Permitted use
Method research, task design and governed abstention.
Limitation
The required donor- and cell-state-matched perturbation outcome matrix does not exist in the release.
Do not infer
No candidate ranking, efficacy prediction or virtual DMD response population.
State-changing gateAcquire and freeze matched DMD perturbation outcomes before model selection.
REL-06PROHIBITED

Therapeutic, patient & clinical use

No clinical calibration, prospective outcome set or authorization exists.

Current evidencezero calibrated DMD models · zero prospective predictions · zero measured outcomes · DOI and institutional licences pending
Permitted use
None beyond research hypothesis and study-design support.
Limitation
The platform is a research resource, not a medical device or treatment recommender.
Do not infer
No diagnosis, prognosis, treatment selection, dosing or patient-level digital twin.
State-changing gateA separate clinically governed development and validation program; current research gates cannot unlock it.

Machine-checked receipt

Engineering confidence has a reproducible trail.

These checks protect route, schema and release integrity. They do not validate biological predictions.

Source candidateUNVERIFIED_AFTER_SOURCE_BUILD
  • Full build, scientific validators, rendered contracts and lint
  • EXTERNAL POST BUILD RECEIPT REQUIRED
  • A source bundle cannot prove its own later deployment.
Latest bundled historical deploymentSites 167 · SUCCEEDED

Moat-building plan

The current moat is trust infrastructure. The future moat is proprietary DMD perturbation outcome.

Each stage names the object that must exist before the advantage can strengthen.

Download moat plan →
MOAT-0000

Trust infrastructure

Typed evidence, model and reliability contracts with negative-result preservation.

Acceptance gate
Every claim has provenance, execution state, failure state, ceiling and next gate.
No shortcut
Do not replace explicit states with a synthetic trust score.
Auditable research decision support.
MOAT-0101

Matched DMD perturbation pilot

Candidate-conditioned DMD myogenic perturbation outcomes with independent biological units, molecular and functional readouts.

Acceptance gate
Frozen estimand, controls, donor/culture units, QC, toxicity and complete outcome return.
No shortcut
Do not substitute healthy myoblast, HepG2 or unperturbed DMD context.
First proprietary disease-task truth and model eligibility.
MOAT-0202

Donor-resolved benchmark

Leakage-safe donor, state and perturbation holdouts with permanent simple baselines.

Acceptance gate
Perturbation-specific, population, calibration and functional layers pass prospectively.
No shortcut
Cells cannot be treated as independent donors and mean RMSE cannot be the only metric.
Defensible NMD generalization evidence.
MOAT-0303

Prospective learning loop

Registered predictions whose positive, null, toxic and failed outcomes return to the same evidence graph.

Acceptance gate
Immutable preregistration, blinded evaluation, calibration and independent replication.
No shortcut
Retrospective fit cannot be relabeled as prospective validation.
Compounding proprietary evidence and a genuinely exercised closed loop.

Update rule

A new page cannot upgrade a reliability state.

A reliability state changes only when its named next gate produces a versioned object; a new page, model name or external citation cannot upgrade it.

This registry audits current product and evidence reliability. It is not a certification, medical-device assessment, therapeutic recommendation or substitute for prospective biological and clinical validation.