GSE293514 · human myoblast KOAssessed
Fusion endpoint context only; not DMD rescue.
CALR perturbation evidence
Perturbation Lab
What happened when this gene was perturbed?Inspect observed responses and clearly labelled no-interaction previews.
Choose a gene and view the observed response, a simple two-gene preview or an external reference.Choose a context, modality and gene first. Counterfactual, interaction and perturbed-fate predictions remain unavailable until matched data exist.
What happened when this gene was perturbed?
CALR was perturbed with CRISPRi in HepG2 cells.
Cell contextHepG2—not a DMD muscle model
Observed readoutFrozen gene-expression response
Muscle / DMD validationNot independently replicated
Next useful experimentControlled myogenic perturbation with replication
Boundary: the pair view is an additive “no-interaction” preview. This is not a predicted double perturbation.
SIM-L0 · observed CRISPRi
CALR observed CRISPRi
Computational replication. This is an observed HepG2 CRISPRi record linked to descriptive program inputs; independent muscle/DMD perturbation replication is absent.
Observed experiment
CALR
HepG2 response measured
Direct evidence in the released assay context
Target disease context
?
DMD muscle not yet tested
Matched perturbation data are required
Observed cells86Frozen HepG2 CRISPRi aggregate
Counteralignment0.034Contextual signature relationship; not therapeutic rescue
Skeletal-muscle expression88.63 TPMExpression context, not perturbation validation
Independent DMD replication0Scientific unlock remains unmet
What this means: this page shows measured or clearly bounded reference information. It does not simulate an unmeasured DMD outcome.
Selected-gene external evidence
Context, correction, time-course and calibration evidence
GSE272233 · DMD correction1/3 significant contrasts
CALR transcript response after DMD editing, not CALR perturbation.
GSE52529 · myogenic time courseMeasured reference
Unperturbed 0/24/48/72-hour reference; perturbed fate remains locked.
GSE133344 · CRISPRa calibrationExpression feature present
Feature presence is not target coverage and does not unlock overexpression.
Descriptive overlap
Descriptive overlap with frozen gene programs
Myogenic / contractile0
No compact-list overlap
ECM / fibrotic0
No compact-list overlap
Inflammatory / stress2
PYCARD, SOD2
Cell cycle / proliferation1
MKI67
Metabolic / secretory2
APOA1, GPX3
Proteostasis / membrane1
GPX3
Response details
Compact response-gene lists
APOA1MATN3MT2AMKI67GPX3PYCARDSOD2CRYABCDT1CTNNAL1SYNE1CFB
Server-rendered frozen inputs; descriptive only.Current boundary
Observed same-HepG2 CRISPRi evidence only; independent DMD validation is absent.
Open CALR evidence record · Open Study Card
Virtual-cell state transition
Perturbation must be tied to state, time and function.
A useful virtual cell should connect an intervention to early molecular response, cell-state transition and late muscle function—while retaining uncertainty and replication status.
MyoblastFusionMyotubeMolecularFunctional
Concept visual · not a measured trajectory or calibrated prediction.
DefineGene + CRISPRiHepG2 · endpoint aggregateObserved
0 hTarget perturbation21 singleton aggregatesObserved
6–12 hEarly mechanismResponse-program descriptionPartial
24–48 hCell-state transitionNeeds perturbed time courseLocked
4–7 dDMD functionNeeds myogenic replicationLocked
Pair previewδA + δBInteraction γAB remains unknown until observed doubles exist.
Perturbation evidence and preview ladder
Every view carries its evidence role
Capability boundary
Available now versus data required
Evidence-backed views
- Observed CRISPRi · 21 frozen HepG2 singleton aggregates
- Additive hypothesis · δA + δB null preview with no interaction term
- Reference trajectory · real unperturbed human-myogenic time course
Locked outputs
- Knockout · matched KO and editing calibration
- CRISPRa / overexpression · matched muscle or DMD activation response
- Interaction · observed same-screen doubles
- Perturbed fate · dynamic perturbation sampling
Locked items expose only their unlock conditions; they do not emit simulated values.
External evidence registry
Four public reference datasets are qualified—each with a different permitted role
The cards separate direct perturbation evidence, muscle phenotype screening, DMD correction, unperturbed myogenic time evolution and cross-cell-line CRISPRa-combination calibration.
Current substrateHepG2 CRISPRi
21 observed single perturbations remain the only direct response substrate in the browser.
- Direct candidates
- 21
- Observed doubles
- 0
GSE293514Human myoblast fusion screen
Stage B0 now exposes the observed healthy-human-myoblast network; absence from the fusion-hit set remains endpoint-specific.
- Published screen hits
- 250
- Individual validation
- 125
GSE272233DMD CRISPR-correction reference
Bulk RNA-seq from three exon-duplication backgrounds and matched corrected clones; candidate transcripts are observations, not candidate perturbation effects.
- Samples
- 21
- Correction DE calls
- 5923
GSE52529Human myogenic time course
Primary human skeletal myoblast single cells at 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours, with distributed pseudotime and state assignments.
- Cells
- 271
- Candidate coverage
- 20/21
GSE133344CRISPRa + pair calibration
K562 single and combinatorial CRISPRa benchmark. It calibrates method design, not muscle-context candidate overexpression effects.
- Reported perturbations
- 287
- Feature coverage
- 20/21
Unlock conditions
What the next data release must add
Editing efficiency, residual expression, controls and context-matched outcomes; CRISPRi cannot be relabelled as KO.
GSE133344 now calibrates study and pair design, but activation dose and expression response must be observed in muscle/DMD context; the negative of a knockdown response is not accepted.
Same-screen singletons and doubles with pair-disjoint validation before estimating γAB, synergy or synthetic rescue.
GSE52529 supplies the unperturbed 0/24/48/72-hour reference. Candidate-conditioned velocity or fate still requires matched perturbation cells sampled across the lineage.
Boundary. The program lens is a descriptive overlap display, not formal pathway enrichment. The pair view is an additive hypothesis, not an observed double perturbation. No output is a treatment, safety, causal-mechanism or clinical recommendation.