Skip to main content
NMD-VCell Research OSDisease state → cell state → target → experiment
SearchLaunch Workspace
View: Plain
Release 2026.08DMD context observedDMD candidate-conditioned prediction not yet eligible
View scientific status
Evidence freeze: 3 August 2026Resource: v1.2.0-measured-dmd-evidenceSchema: 1.1Open release status
Explore NMD-VCell

Gene evidence summary

DNM1

Current recommendation: Reproduce the result independently.

What we know

DNM1 was experimentally perturbed in HepG2 cells.

What remains uncertain

Different DMD datasets do not fully agree on the disease-associated direction. A matched perturbation in a DMD-relevant muscle model is the truth needed to calibrate a future DMD-response model.

What should happen next

Reproduce the result independently. Use independent reagents and biological replication, and predeclare one functional endpoint.

Current value: this record identifies the most informative next experiment and the result needed for model calibration. It does not yet establish a therapeutic or clinical conclusion.

Design this experimentReview research evidenceCompare evidenceOpen core data

Evidence journey

Where DNM1 stands—and what creates the next evidence

Read left to right from released knowledge to translation. The highlighted next step is a research decision, not a target score.

Inspect datasets and methods →
01 · Database supportVersioned gene recordStable identity, provenance and downloadable evidence are available.
02 · Disease contextDMD context assembledSource-specific DMD signals are retained separately for interpretation.
03 · Model evidenceCalibration truth neededThe current evidence defines what a future DMD-response model must learn and test.
04 · Experimental perturbationObserved outside DMD muscleThe HepG2 response is useful for context transfer, not yet DMD truth.
05 · Functional phenotypeNext decision experimentReproduce the result independently
06 · Clinical evidenceFuture translation layerClinical interpretation follows reproducible disease-matched functional evidence.

Data behind this summary

Exact values currently available for DNM1

These values come from different biological contexts and are displayed separately. They are not combined into one target score.

Open all dataset rows →
HepG2 perturbation coverage116 cellsCells in the frozen aggregate; not biological replicates.
Skeletal-muscle expression1.39988 TPMGTEx v8 tissue-expression context; not perturbation evidence.
DMD source effects2/4 directions agree4 source-specific effects retained without pooling.
Human-myoblast fusion screenNot assessedMissing is not a negative result.

What this candidate is for

Does the DNM1 evidence pattern survive an independent dataset and frozen analysis workflow?

A candidate record authorizes a bounded question and next experiment. It does not authorize a therapeutic or clinical claim.

Practical useDecide whether the computational signal is reproducible enough to justify experimental escalation.
Decision available nowExperimental escalation remains provisional until the signal is independently reproduced.
What blocks itIndependent computational replication is absent
Minimum next actionRepeat the DNM1 analysis with frozen mapping, contrasts, baselines, null controls and uncertainty reporting.
How would the result change the decision?

SupportiveRetain the candidate and move to its next context-specific gate if direction and uncertainty reproduce.

NullRetain the negative result and do not escalate from the original analysis alone if replication fails with adequate QC.

Inconclusive / QC failureMark the replication non-evaluable when coverage, mapping or source design prevents a fair test.

Open Study CardPlan the experimentCompare decision gaps

Plain view presents the current story. Open Research for evidence details or Audit for machine fields and provenance.